_s Party Polarization and Legislative Gridlock
نویسنده
چکیده
This article investigates how parties affect legislative gridlock-the inability of government to enact significant proposals on the policy agenda. Conventional ccounts suggest that divided party control of government causes such stalemate. I offer an alternative partisan model of gridlock that incorporates party polarization, party seat division, and the interaction between these two factors. Using an original data set of major legislative proposals considered between 1975 and 1994, I find that divided government does not affect gridlock once party polarization and party seat division are taken into account. Instead, I find that higher party polarization increases the likelihood of encountering gridlock on a given proposal, but that the magnitude of this increase diminishes to the extent that a party is close to having enough seats to thwart filibusters and vetoes.
منابع مشابه
Does Partisan Polarization Lead to Policy Gridlock in California? Figure: Partisan Polarization and Gridlock in California The recent rise in gridlock cannot be solely explained by increases in polarization
متن کامل
Conditional Party Government in the States
©2002 by the Midwest Political Science Association A lthough theories about legislative politics continue to proliferate, their range of empirical application is all too often limited, generally encompassing only the U.S. Congress or even just the House. Here, we conduct what is essentially comparative research by testing theories of parties and committees in a number of state legislatures. Thi...
متن کاملW . ALLEN WALLIS Institute of POLITICAL ECONOMY UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER Dynamics of the Presidential Veto : A Computational
We specify and compute equilibria of a dynamic policy-making game between a president and a legislature under insitutional rules that emulate those of the US Constitution. Policies are assumed to lie in a two-dimensional space in which one issue dimension captures systemic differences in partisan preferences, while the other summarizes non-partisan attributes of policy. In any period, the polic...
متن کاملParty Polarization in Legislatures with Office-Motivated Candidates
We develop a theory of legislative competition in which voters care about local candidate valence and national party positions that are determined by the parties’ median legislators. As long as election outcomes are predictable enough, the only stable equilibria exhibit policy divergence between the parties. If the degree of uncertainty about election outcomes decreases, and if voters place les...
متن کاملComparative Politics with Endogenous Intra-Party Discipline1
Party discipline is known to be di¤erent in Parliamentary and in Presidential democracies. Yet, the theoretical literature is silent about why parties adopt such di¤erent structures. We propose a setup where parties are brands. They strategically choose both their ideological position and their internal discipline. The latter introduces a trade-o¤ between the informativeness of the party label ...
متن کامل